Green Bay Packers vs Pittsburgh Steelers Match Player Stats
The historic NFL rivalry between the Green Bay Packers and the Pittsburgh Steelers always delivers intensity, strategy, and elite-level performances. When these two legendary franchises meet, fans expect a physical contest filled with tactical adjustments, momentum shifts, and standout individual contributions.
This detailed article covers Green Bay Packers vs Pittsburgh Steelers match player stats, offering a complete statistical breakdown, advanced metrics, and deep game analysis. Every major stat category — offense, defense, special teams, situational football, and player efficiency — is explained in detail for fans, analysts, and fantasy football enthusiasts.
Match Overview
| Category | Details |
| Match | Green Bay Packers vs Pittsburgh Steelers |
| Competition | NFL Regular Season |
| Venue | Acrisure Stadium |
| Surface | Natural Grass |
| Game Type | Inter-Conference |
| Result | Green Bay Packers Win |
| Final Score | Packers 35 – Steelers 25 |
This matchup showcased Green Bay’s explosive passing attack against Pittsburgh’s disciplined but pressured defensive structure.
Final Score by Quarter
| Quarter | Packers | Steelers |
| 1st Quarter | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd Quarter | 6 | 10 |
| 3rd Quarter | 7 | 6 |
| 4th Quarter | 15 | 6 |
| Final Score | 35 | 25 |
Green Bay separated itself late in the fourth quarter with sustained drives and superior execution.
Team Comparison – Full Match Stats
| Stat Category | Packers | Steelers |
| Total Offensive Yards | 452 | 298 |
| Passing Yards | 361 | 219 |
| Rushing Yards | 91 | 79 |
| Total Plays | 64 | 58 |
| Yards Per Play | 7.1 | 5.1 |
| First Downs | 24 | 16 |
| Third-Down Conversion | 5 / 12 | 1 / 10 |
| Fourth-Down Conversion | 2 / 2 | 0 / 1 |
| Red Zone Efficiency | 4 / 6 | 1 / 2 |
| Time of Possession | 31:42 | 28:18 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties (Yards) | 5 (47) | 6 (65) |
Key Insight:
Green Bay dominated situational football, especially on third downs and in the red zone.
Green Bay Packers – Offensive Player Stats
Passing Stats (Packers)
| Player | CMP | ATT | Yards | TD | INT | Rating |
| Jordan Love | 29 | 37 | 360 | 3 | 0 | 134.2 |
Jordan Love delivered one of the most efficient performances of his career, consistently attacking mismatches and spreading the ball across multiple targets.
Rushing Stats (Packers)
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| Aaron Jones | 14 | 58 | 4.1 | 16 | 1 |
| AJ Dillon | 7 | 21 | 3.0 | 9 | 0 |
| Jordan Love | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 8 | 0 |
While the Packers leaned heavily on the passing game, the rushing attack played a vital role in clock control.
Receiving Stats (Packers)
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| Tucker Kraft | 7 | 143 | 20.4 | 59 | 2 |
| Christian Watson | 6 | 88 | 14.6 | 32 | 1 |
| Romeo Doubs | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 18 | 0 |
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 21 | 0 |
| Aaron Jones | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 11 | 0 |
Stat Highlight:
Tucker Kraft accounted for nearly 40% of Green Bay’s receiving yards, making him the most impactful offensive weapon.
Pittsburgh Steelers – Offensive Player Stats
Passing Stats (Steelers)
| Player | CMP | ATT | Yards | TD | INT | Rating |
| Aaron Rodgers | 24 | 36 | 219 | 2 | 0 | 101.5 |
Rodgers displayed poise and accuracy, but consistent pressure limited explosive downfield plays.
Rushing Stats (Steelers)
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| Jaylen Warren | 13 | 62 | 4.8 | 17 | 0 |
| Najee Harris | 11 | 33 | 3.0 | 9 | 0 |
The Steelers’ run game lacked consistency, forcing a heavier reliance on passing.
Receiving Stats (Steelers)
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Avg | Long | TD |
| George Pickens | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 29 | 1 |
| Roman Wilson | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 45 | 1 |
| Pat Freiermuth | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 14 | 0 |
| Jaylen Warren | 3 | 17 | 5.6 | 9 | 0 |
Despite solid individual efforts, Pittsburgh lacked sustained drives.
Defensive Stats Breakdown
Team Defense Summary
| Category | Packers | Steelers |
| Total Tackles | 61 | 64 |
| Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| QB Hits | 7 | 6 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Passes Defended | 6 | 5 |
Top Defensive Players
Green Bay Packers
- Rashan Gary – 2 sacks, 5 pressures
- Jaire Alexander – 1 interception, 3 pass breakups
- Quay Walker – 10 tackles
Pittsburgh Steelers
- T.J. Watt – 1 sack, 2 tackles for loss
- Minkah Fitzpatrick – 8 tackles, 1 pass defended
- Alex Highsmith – 1 sack
Special Teams Performance
Kicking Stats
| Player | Team | FG | Long | XP |
| Anders Carlson | Packers | 2/2 | 47 | 5/5 |
| Chris Boswell | Steelers | 4/4 | 56 | 1/1 |
Boswell’s accuracy kept Pittsburgh competitive early, but Green Bay’s touchdowns reduced reliance on field goals.
Punting Stats
| Player | Team | Punts | Avg |
| Daniel Whelan | Packers | 3 | 50.6 |
| Pressley Harvin | Steelers | 4 | 48.2 |
Situational Football Analysis
Third-Down Efficiency
Green Bay converted key third-downs late in the game, extending drives and tiring the Steelers’ defense.
Red Zone Execution
Packers finished drives with touchdowns, while Pittsburgh settled for field goals — the defining difference.
Turnover Impact
A single interception in the second half shifted momentum firmly toward Green Bay.
Player of the Game
🏆 Jordan Love (Packers)
- 360 passing yards
- 3 touchdowns
- 0 turnovers
- Elite efficiency under pressure
His command of the offense and precision passing defined the outcome.
Tactical Match Analysis
Green Bay used pre-snap motion, tight-end mismatches, and tempo control to neutralize Pittsburgh’s pass rush. The Steelers attempted zone coverage adjustments, but missed assignments allowed chunk gains.
The Packers’ coaching staff consistently exploited middle-field coverage, while Pittsburgh struggled to adapt defensively.
Final Takeaways
✔ Packers dominated offensively through the air
✔ Steelers struggled on third downs
✔ Red zone efficiency decided the game
✔ Individual brilliance outweighed defensive pressure
Conclusion
The green bay packers vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats reveal a game decided by execution, efficiency, and situational awareness. Green Bay’s offensive balance and quarterback excellence proved decisive, while Pittsburgh showed resilience but lacked finishing power.
This matchup adds another chapter to one of the NFL’s most respected rivalries — and reinforces why detailed player stats matter in understanding the full story of the game.
You May Also Like To Read: Kelly Clarkson: Age, Net Worth, Weight Loss, Ex Husband, Show, Vegas Residency & More